Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1988

Supreme Court of India · 1988-08-16

VIJAY PRAKASH D. MEHTA & ANR. vs COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), BOMBAY

Citation / case number
SC 1987/71208
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VIJAY PRAKASH D. MEHTA & ANR.
Respondent
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), BOMBAY
Author
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI
Bench
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the right to appeal under Section 129E of the Customs Act is conditional and not absolute, emphasizing that compliance with statutory requirements is necessary for the right to be exercisable. The Court clarified that the Appellate Tribunal has the authority to reject appeals for non-compliance with the deposit requirement, and the discretion to waive such deposits in cases of undue hardship is judicially guided. The appeals were dismissed as the Tribunal's decision to uphold the penalty was made after considering the appellants' claims of hardship and the overall circumstances of the case.

VIJAY PRAKASH D. MEHTA & ANR. vs COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), BOMBAY · Niyam