Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1987

Supreme Court of India · 1987-09-11

RASHPAL MALHOTRA vs MRS. SATYA RAJPUT AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
SC 1981/63636
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RASHPAL MALHOTRA
Respondent
MRS. SATYA RAJPUT AND ANOTHER
Author
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI
Bench
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the eviction order under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, ruling that the tenancy agreement was not with the appellant but with a legal entity, Kailash Chemical and Textile Mills Ltd. The Court clarified that the appellant, although signing on behalf of the lessee, was not a tenant and thus the eviction proceedings were maintainable. The Court emphasized that the parties were aware of the true nature of the tenancy and that no prejudice was caused by the absence of formal parties in the eviction suit.

RASHPAL MALHOTRA vs MRS. SATYA RAJPUT AND ANOTHER · Niyam