Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1987

Supreme Court of India · 1987-10-15

RAVINDRA KUMAR MISRA vs U.P. STATE HANDLOOM CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1985/66967
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAVINDRA KUMAR MISRA
Respondent
U.P. STATE HANDLOOM CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.
Author
MISRA RANGNATH
Bench
MISRA RANGNATH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Rule 63 of the U.P. State Handloom Corporation Rules, a temporary employee's service can be terminated with one month's notice without it being considered punitive. The Court clarified that while an assessment of the employee's performance is necessary, the termination must not be based on motives that transfer the assessment into a punitive dismissal. In this case, the appellant's termination was upheld as it did not carry any stigma or adverse consequences, thus not requiring adherence to principles of natural justice under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

RAVINDRA KUMAR MISRA vs U.P. STATE HANDLOOM CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. · Niyam