Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1987

Supreme Court of India · 1987-10-08

P.K. DIXIT AND ORS. vs STATF OF U.P. & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1984/68309
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
P.K. DIXIT AND ORS.
Respondent
STATF OF U.P. & ORS.
Author
G.L. OZA
Bench
G.L. OZA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the period of officiation for State Judicial Service Officers must be considered as a period of probation, and their confirmation should date from the earliest available vacancy. The Court emphasized that prior to the U.P. Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975, there was no provision for direct recruitment, thus all posts were to be filled by promotion. Consequently, seniority must be calculated based on the date of confirmation rather than an arbitrary date set by the High Court, ensuring fairness in the promotion process under Rules 3, 8, and 26 of the 1975 Rules.

P.K. DIXIT AND ORS. vs STATF OF U.P. & ORS. · Niyam