Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1987

Supreme Court of India · 1987-05-06

SMT. SHAKUNTALA S. TIWARI vs HEM CHAND M. SINGHANIA

Citation / case number
SC 1987/71038
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SMT. SHAKUNTALA S. TIWARI
Respondent
HEM CHAND M. SINGHANIA
Author
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI
Bench
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that in suits for recovery of possession under the Bombay Rents, Hotels and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, the applicable period of limitation is 12 years under Articles 66 or 67 of the Limitation Act, 1963, rather than 3 years under Article 113. The Court clarified that the cause of action accrues when the tenant commits acts that breach the tenancy agreement, not merely upon formal termination of the tenancy. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, allowing the landlord's writ petition and dismissing the tenant's appeal.

SMT. SHAKUNTALA S. TIWARI vs HEM CHAND M. SINGHANIA · Niyam