Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1987

Supreme Court of India · 1987-03-27

HARI OM GAUTAM. vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MATHURA & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1987/71226
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HARI OM GAUTAM.
Respondent
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MATHURA & ANR.
Author
E.S. VENKATARAMIAH
Bench
E.S. VENKATARAMIAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the District Magistrate's authority under Rule 93 of the U.P. Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 is limited to determining parking and halting places as per Section 76 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The Court clarified that bus stands can only be designated by the Regional Transport Authority under Section 68(2)(r) of the Act. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition challenging the District Magistrate's order and the Town Area Committee's fee levy.

HARI OM GAUTAM. vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MATHURA & ANR. · Niyam