Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 1987

Supreme Court of India · 1987-07-17

GANPAT RAM SHARMA & ORS. vs SMT. GAYATRI DEVI

Citation / case number
SC 1980/63240
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GANPAT RAM SHARMA & ORS.
Respondent
SMT. GAYATRI DEVI
Author
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI
Bench
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 14(1)(h) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, clarifying that the terms 'has built', 'has acquired', and 'has been allotted' indicate that a tenant must have a residence available for occupation at the time of eviction application. The Court upheld the High Court's ruling that the landlord's knowledge of the tenant's ownership of another property did not constitute a waiver of rights under the Act. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the eviction order based on the tenant's eligibility under the specified clause.

GANPAT RAM SHARMA & ORS. vs SMT. GAYATRI DEVI · Niyam