Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1987

Supreme Court of India · 1987-02-17

GOKAK PATEL VOLKART LIMITED vs COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BELGAUM

Citation / case number
SC 1986/69977
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GOKAK PATEL VOLKART LIMITED
Respondent
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BELGAUM
Author
MISRA RANGNATH
Bench
MISRA RANGNATH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that a show cause notice issued beyond the limitation period specified under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 is invalid. The Court clarified that the statutory scheme requires a notice to be a condition precedent to a demand, and since the High Court did not stay the service of notice, the benefit of the Explanation to Section 11A was not available to the Respondent. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the demand was set aside as it contravened statutory provisions.

GOKAK PATEL VOLKART LIMITED vs COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BELGAUM · Niyam