Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1987

Supreme Court of India · 1987-04-01

TOTA SINGH & ANR. vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
SC 1978/90434
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
TOTA SINGH & ANR.
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Author
V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI
Bench
V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's interference with the acquittal of the appellants under Section 302 IPC and Section 323 IPC was unjustified, as it disregarded the established principles governing appeals against acquittals. The Court emphasized that an appellate court may only interfere if the trial court's approach is vitiated by manifest illegality or if the conclusions are perverse. The Court found that the High Court's reappraisal of evidence did not meet these criteria, leading to the allowance of the appeal and the restoration of the acquittal.

TOTA SINGH & ANR. vs STATE OF PUNJAB · Niyam