Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1987

Supreme Court of India · 1987-04-22

SMT. PADMAVATI JAIKRISHNA vs ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME 'FAX,GUJARAT AHMEDABAD

Citation / case number
SC 1975/60554
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SMT. PADMAVATI JAIKRISHNA
Respondent
ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME 'FAX,GUJARAT AHMEDABAD
Bench
MISRA RANGNATH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a claim for deduction must demonstrate that the expenditure was wholly and exclusively for the purpose of earning income. The Court affirmed the High Court's finding that the interest paid on loans was related to personal liabilities, such as income tax and wealth tax, and not for generating income. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was dismissed, reinforcing the necessity for clear evidence of the purpose of the expenditure to qualify for deduction.

SMT. PADMAVATI JAIKRISHNA vs ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME 'FAX,GUJARAT AHMEDABAD · Niyam