Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1986

Supreme Court of India · 1986-10-01

KARNATAKA STATE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. ETC. ETC. vs KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL & ORS. ETC.ETC

Citation / case number
SC 1986/69746
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KARNATAKA STATE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. ETC. ETC.
Respondent
KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL & ORS. ETC.ETC
Author
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY
Bench
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted the proviso to Section 63(7) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, holding that it establishes a rule of preference rather than exclusion for granting tourist vehicle permits. The Court ruled that eligible applicants' claims must be evaluated on their merits, applying the preference rule only when claims are approximately equal. The Court found that the fourth sub-clause of the proviso did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution, thus allowing the appeals and setting aside the previous decisions that favored preferred categories without merit consideration.

KARNATAKA STATE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. ETC. ETC. vs KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL & ORS. ETC.ETC · Niyam