Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1986

Supreme Court of India · 1986-05-08

PAKIRBHAI FUIABHAI SOINNKI vs PRESIDING 0l717ICER & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1986/69802
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PAKIRBHAI FUIABHAI SOINNKI
Respondent
PRESIDING 0l717ICER & ANR.
Bench
VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J)

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 33(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a workman must be paid a reasonable subsistence allowance during the pendency of proceedings to ensure a fair opportunity to defend themselves. The Court found that the non-payment of such allowance violated principles of natural justice, thereby vitiating the Tribunal's proceedings. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, emphasizing that a workman remains an employee until the Tribunal grants permission for dismissal.

PAKIRBHAI FUIABHAI SOINNKI vs PRESIDING 0l717ICER & ANR. · Niyam