SAWAI SINGH vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN

The Supreme Court held that vague charges in a departmental inquiry, particularly those leading to termination of service, violate principles of natural justice. The Court emphasized that the evidence must be specific and substantial, citing Section 463 IPC and Section 45 of the Evidence Act regarding the necessity of handwriting expert testimony. The Court found the termination order unsustainable due to lack of clear evidence and opportunity for cross-examination, thereby allowing the appeal and reinstating the appellant.