Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1986

Supreme Court of India · 1986-03-11

SANTOSH KUMAR & ORS. vs CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1986/69814
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SANTOSH KUMAR & ORS.
Respondent
CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION & ANR.
Author
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY
Bench
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 50(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, a Government, Company, or Local Authority cannot seek a reference under Section 18 for enhancement or reduction of compensation awarded by the Collector, except on grounds of fraud, corruption, or collusion. The Court ruled that the High Court erred in entertaining a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the Collector's award, as such challenges are barred by the Act. The judgment emphasized that the Collector's award is an offer by the Government and cannot be questioned by the acquiring authority, affirming the legal framework established by Sections 11, 18, 25, and 50(2).

SANTOSH KUMAR & ORS. vs CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION & ANR. · Niyam