Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1986

Supreme Court of India · 1986-03-13

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. vs BASANTIBAI MOHANLAL KHETAN & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1984/68340
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
Respondent
BASANTIBAI MOHANLAL KHETAN & ORS.
Author
E.S. VENKATARAMIAH
Bench
E.S. VENKATARAMIAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of sub-sections 3 and 4 of Section 44 of the Maharashtra Housing and Development Act, 1976, determining that these provisions infringe Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution. The Court held that the provisions were unreasonable and discriminatory, thus rendering them ultra vires Article 14. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision declaring these sub-sections unconstitutional.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. vs BASANTIBAI MOHANLAL KHETAN & ORS. · Niyam