Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1986

Supreme Court of India · 1986-01-28

OM PARKASH AGARWAL ETC.ETC. vs GIRI RAJ KISHORI & ORS. ETC.ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 1985/66998
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
OM PARKASH AGARWAL ETC.ETC.
Respondent
GIRI RAJ KISHORI & ORS. ETC.ETC.
Author
E.S. VENKATARAMIAH
Bench
E.S. VENKATARAMIAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court declared the Haryana Rural Development Fund Act, 1983 unconstitutional, holding that the State Legislature lacked the competence to enact it. The Court emphasized that a levy must be genuinely a fee and not a tax disguised as a fee, as per the constitutional provisions. The Act was quashed as the cess imposed did not meet the criteria for a valid fee under Entry 66 of List II of the Seventh Schedule, and the Court found no justification for the levy under any constitutional entry.

OM PARKASH AGARWAL ETC.ETC. vs GIRI RAJ KISHORI & ORS. ETC.ETC. · Niyam