Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1986

Supreme Court of India · 1986-12-20

SHEO NANDAN PASWAN vs STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1982/63900
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHEO NANDAN PASWAN
Respondent
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
Author
BHAGWATI, P.N. (),VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. ,KHALID, V. ,OZA, G.L. ,NATRAJAN, S.
Bench
BHAGWATI, P.N. (CJ),VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. ,KHALID, V. ,OZA, G.L. ,NATRAJAN, S.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the scope of Section 321 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, regarding the Public Prosecutor's power to withdraw from prosecution and the Magistrate's consent. It held that a complainant has locus standi to file a revision before the High Court and an appeal under Article 136 against an order granting consent to withdraw a criminal case. The Court clarified that 'discharge' under Section 321 differs from discharge under Sections 227 or 239, emphasizing the need for an error apparent on the face of the record for review under Article 137 of the Constitution.

SHEO NANDAN PASWAN vs STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. · Niyam