Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1985

Supreme Court of India · 1985-05-08

BANWARI LAL KOTIYA vs P.C. AGGARWAL

Citation / case number
SC 1972/60426
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BANWARI LAL KOTIYA
Respondent
P.C. AGGARWAL
Author
V.D. TULZAPURKAR
Bench
V.D. TULZAPURKAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under the Arbitration Act, 1940, specifically Sections 2(a), 2(e), and 20, a valid arbitration reference requires the consent of both parties, and a unilateral reference is insufficient. The Court found that the respondent, despite signing the Contract Notes, did not consent to the actual reference as he failed to nominate an arbitrator, rendering the reference unilateral. Consequently, the Court upheld the Full Bench's decision that the respondent was not bound by the arbitration award, leading to the dismissal of the appellant's claim.

BANWARI LAL KOTIYA vs P.C. AGGARWAL · Niyam