Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1985

Supreme Court of India · 1985-03-19

GANPAT ROY AND OTHERS ETC. vs THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND OTHERS ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 1983/65997
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GANPAT ROY AND OTHERS ETC.
Respondent
THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND OTHERS ETC.
Author
D.P. MADON
Bench
D.P. MADON

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Amendment Act, 1976, the District Magistrate must provide an opportunity to landlords and tenants before making an allotment order under Section 16(1). However, the amendment does not require the same for tenants when releasing premises to landlords. The Court directed the High Court to rehear the writ petitions on merits, emphasizing the need for procedural fairness in allotment and release processes under Sections 16 and 18 of the Act.

GANPAT ROY AND OTHERS ETC. vs THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND OTHERS ETC. · Niyam