Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1985

Supreme Court of India · 1985-03-27

HENRY WESTMULLER ROBERTS, ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF ASSAM & ORS. ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 1983/65993
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HENRY WESTMULLER ROBERTS, ETC. ETC.
Respondent
STATE OF ASSAM & ORS. ETC.
Author
A. VARADARAJAN
Bench
A. VARADARAJAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that a confessional statement cannot be deemed inadmissible solely due to insufficient time for reflection, as per Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court affirmed the conviction of the accused under Section 302 IPC for murder, Section 364 IPC for kidnapping, and Section 201 IPC for concealing evidence, while also addressing the validity of confessions made after a three-hour reflection period. The Court upheld the death sentence for the primary accused, confirming the High Court's decision on the matter.

HENRY WESTMULLER ROBERTS, ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF ASSAM & ORS. ETC. · Niyam