Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1985

Supreme Court of India · 1985-01-24

S. SUNDARAM PILLAI, ETC. vs V.R. PATTABIRAMAN ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 1984/68509
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S. SUNDARAM PILLAI, ETC.
Respondent
V.R. PATTABIRAMAN ETC.
Author
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI
Bench
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted 'wilful default' under Section 10(2)(i) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, clarifying that a tenant's non-payment of rent after two months' notice does not automatically constitute wilful default if the circumstances warrant a different conclusion. The Court held that the Controller must assess the specifics of each case rather than rely solely on the Explanation added by Act 23 of 1973. The appeals were allowed, overturning the Madras High Court's eviction orders against the tenants.

S. SUNDARAM PILLAI, ETC. vs V.R. PATTABIRAMAN ETC. · Niyam