Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1985

Supreme Court of India · 1985-02-27

K.RAMANATHAN vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1983/65999
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
K.RAMANATHAN
Respondent
STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR.
Author
A.P. SEN
Bench
A.P. SEN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Clause 3 (IA) of the Tamil Nadu Paddy (Restriction on Movement) Order, 1982, which imposed a complete ban on the transport of paddy outside specified districts. The Court ruled that the powers conferred under Section 3(2)(d) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, allow for such prohibitions as part of the regulatory framework established by the Central Government. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision and clarifying that the delegation of powers does not limit the State's authority to regulate essential commodities under the Act.

K.RAMANATHAN vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. · Niyam