Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1985

Supreme Court of India · 1985-02-18

VENGDASALAM PILLAI vs UNION TERRITORY OF PONDICHERRY

Citation / case number
SC 1980/63264
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VENGDASALAM PILLAI
Respondent
UNION TERRITORY OF PONDICHERRY
Author
V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI
Bench
V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted the definition of 'family' under Section 2(10) of The Pondicherry Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1973, holding that minor sons must be considered members of the family for ceiling limit calculations, regardless of prior partition. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that the lands held by the appellant's wife and minor sons should be included in the appellant's holding, thus exceeding the ceiling limit. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling that the appellant was not within the permissible ceiling limit as defined by the Act.

VENGDASALAM PILLAI vs UNION TERRITORY OF PONDICHERRY · Niyam