Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1985

Supreme Court of India · 1985-04-17

Mc DOWELL & COMPANY LIMITED vs THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

Citation / case number
SC 1983/65945
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mc DOWELL & COMPANY LIMITED
Respondent
THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER
Bench
CHANDRACHUD, Y.V. ((CJ),DESAI, D.A.,REDDY, O. CHINNAPPA ,VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. ,MISRA RANGNATH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the primary liability to pay excise duty under amended Rule 76(a) and Rule 79(1) of the A.P. Distillery Rules rests with the holder of the D-2 licence. The Court clarified that excise duty paid by buyers of the appellant's liquor is part of the appellant's turnover for sales tax purposes. The appeal was dismissed, and the correctness of a previous decision was referred to a larger bench, indicating a significant legal principle regarding tax liability and avoidance.

Mc DOWELL & COMPANY LIMITED vs THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER · Niyam