Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1984

Supreme Court of India · 1984-10-10

M. P. MITTAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1978/90350
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M. P. MITTAL
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
Author
R.S. PATHAK
Bench
R.S. PATHAK

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court has the discretion to refuse relief if granting it would defeat the interests of justice. The appellant, who guaranteed the payment of dividends due from M/s. Depro Foods Limited, was found liable as a guarantor and had not made any effort to discharge his liability. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's decision to deny relief, emphasizing the need for a brief statement of reasons when dismissing writ petitions in limine.

M. P. MITTAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. · Niyam