Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1984

Supreme Court of India · 1984-05-10

KATHEEJA BAI vs THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1983/66033
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KATHEEJA BAI
Respondent
THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER & ORS.
Author
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY
Bench
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board is obligated to pay the Special Contribution to the Provident Fund under Regulation 37, despite having paid gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Court clarified that the Special Contribution is distinct from gratuity, as it is specifically labeled as such in the Board's own regulations and is intended to reward good and faithful service. The Electricity Board's refusal to make this payment on the grounds of it being akin to gratuity was deemed unjustified, leading to the allowance of the petition.

KATHEEJA BAI vs THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER & ORS. · Niyam