Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1984

Supreme Court of India · 1984-02-20

RAVI DUTT SHARMA vs RATAN LAL BHARGAVA

Citation / case number
SC 1981/63665
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAVI DUTT SHARMA
Respondent
RATAN LAL BHARGAVA
Author
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI
Bench
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Sections 14A, 25A, 25B, and 25C of the Delhi Rent Control Act, ruling that these provisions are special and override existing laws due to their non-obstante clause. The Court clarified that the landlord is not required to obtain permission from the Competent Authority under Section 19(1)(a) of the Slum Areas Improvement and Clearance Act before filing for eviction under Sections 14(1)(e) or 14A of the Rent Act. The Court found that the procedure established in Chapter IIIA of the Rent Act serves the public interest and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution, thereby dismissing the tenant's appeal and Special Leave Petition.

RAVI DUTT SHARMA vs RATAN LAL BHARGAVA · Niyam