Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1984

Supreme Court of India · 1984-08-17

P. JAYAPPAN vs S.K. PERUMAL, FIRST INCOME-TAX OFFICER, TUTICORIN

Citation / case number
SC 1984/68521
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
P. JAYAPPAN
Respondent
S.K. PERUMAL, FIRST INCOME-TAX OFFICER, TUTICORIN
Author
E.S. VENKATARAMIAH
Bench
E.S. VENKATARAMIAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the pendency of reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961 does not bar the initiation of criminal proceedings under Sections 276C and 277 of the Act. The Court clarified that the expectation of a favorable outcome in reassessment does not constitute grounds for quashing criminal proceedings, as the criminal court must independently assess the evidence. The petition for special leave was dismissed, affirming that the prosecution was not an abuse of process of court.

P. JAYAPPAN vs S.K. PERUMAL, FIRST INCOME-TAX OFFICER, TUTICORIN · Niyam