Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1983

Supreme Court of India · 1983-09-05

GEETA ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
SC 1981/63805
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GEETA ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Author
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI
Bench
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that video shows fall within the definition of 'entertainment' under Section 2(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1937, and are thus liable for entertainment tax under Section 3. The Court clarified that the term 'entertainment' is used in a wide sense, encompassing any form of amusement, game, or sport, regardless of whether an admission fee is charged. The judgment dismissed the petitioners' claims, affirming that the operation of video machines constitutes a public exhibition and is exigible to tax.

GEETA ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS · Niyam