Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1983

Supreme Court of India · 1983-05-06

HOECHST PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. AND ANOTHER ETC. vs STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
SC 1983/66055
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HOECHST PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. AND ANOTHER ETC.
Respondent
STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS
Author
A.P. SEN
Bench
A.P. SEN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of sub-section (3) of Section 5 of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, which prohibits dealers from passing on the surcharge to consumers. The Court ruled that this provision does not conflict with Article 246(3) of the Constitution or violate Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The Court emphasized that the classification of dealers based on gross turnover is valid and does not infringe upon their rights under the Essential Commodities Act.

HOECHST PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. AND ANOTHER ETC. vs STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS · Niyam