Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 1983

Supreme Court of India · 1983-07-21

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXBOMBAY CITY-III, BOMBAY vs SHANTILAL PRIVATE LlMITED BOMBAY

Citation / case number
SC 1978/90359
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXBOMBAY CITY-III, BOMBAY
Respondent
SHANTILAL PRIVATE LlMITED BOMBAY
Author
R.S. PATHAK
Bench
R.S. PATHAK

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that a transaction involving a breach of contract, where damages are awarded as compensation by an arbitration award, does not qualify as a speculative transaction under Section 43(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court affirmed the Appellate Tribunal's ruling that the loss incurred by the respondent assessee was a business loss, not speculative, as it arose from a breach rather than a settlement of the contract. The judgment overruled the precedent set in R. Chinnaswami Chettiar v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras, 96 ITR 353.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXBOMBAY CITY-III, BOMBAY vs SHANTILAL PRIVATE LlMITED BOMBAY · Niyam