Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1982

Supreme Court of India · 1982-03-23

BHOPAL SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD. vs STATE OF M.P. & OTHERS

Citation / case number
SC 1968/60432
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BHOPAL SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD.
Respondent
STATE OF M.P. & OTHERS
Author
V.D. TULZAPURKAR
Bench
V.D. TULZAPURKAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Section 21(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply & Purchase) Act, 1958, imposes a commission obligation on sugarcane purchases, which is akin to a fee requiring quid pro quo for services rendered. The Court found that the Cane Development Council's demand for commission on purchases from 'non-reserved area' was justified due to the services provided for better cane production and distribution. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the legality of the commission imposed by the Council.

BHOPAL SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD. vs STATE OF M.P. & OTHERS · Niyam