Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1981

Supreme Court of India · 1981-01-15

SUPERINTENDENT & REMEMBRANCER OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, WEST BENGAL vs SATYEN BHOWMICK AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1975/60614
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUPERINTENDENT & REMEMBRANCER OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, WEST BENGAL
Respondent
SATYEN BHOWMICK AND ORS.
Author
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI
Bench
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 14 of the Official Secrets Act, affirming that it provides courts with the authority to exclude the public from proceedings if evidence disclosure could harm national security. The Court held that this section does not override existing procedural laws, such as the Code of Criminal Procedure, and that the inherent powers of the court to conduct in-camera proceedings remain intact. The Court ruled that the defense lawyers' claim of privilege under Section 126 of the Evidence Act was not valid in this context, allowing for the inspection of notes taken during the proceedings.

SUPERINTENDENT & REMEMBRANCER OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, WEST BENGAL vs SATYEN BHOWMICK AND ORS. · Niyam