Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1981

Supreme Court of India · 1981-08-26

V1NOD KUMAR SHANTILAL GOSALIA vs GANGADHAR NARSINGDAS AGARWAL & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1970/60369
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
V1NOD KUMAR SHANTILAL GOSALIA
Respondent
GANGADHAR NARSINGDAS AGARWAL & ORS.
Author
Y.V. (() CHANDRACHUD
Bench
Y.V. ((CJ) CHANDRACHUD

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of mining rights acquired under Portuguese law in Goa, Daman and Diu following India's annexation. It held that mining rights obtained through a 'Mining Manifest' were valid and enforceable under the Goa, Daman and Diu (Laws) Regulation, 1962, specifically under Sections 2(a), 3(1), and 4(2). The Court clarified that the Title of Manifest, once granted, conferred enduring rights as long as conditions were met, thus affirming the continuity of rights post-annexation.

V1NOD KUMAR SHANTILAL GOSALIA vs GANGADHAR NARSINGDAS AGARWAL & ORS. · Niyam