Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1980

Supreme Court of India · 1980-10-10

H. S. BAINS DIRECTOR SMALL SAVING-CUM-DEPUTY SECRETARY,FINA vs THE STATE (UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH)

Citation / case number
SC 1980/63320
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
H. S. BAINS DIRECTOR SMALL SAVING-CUM-DEPUTY SECRETARY,FINA
Respondent
THE STATE (UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH)
Author
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY
Bench
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that a Magistrate can take cognizance of an offence under Section 190(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, even if the police report under Section 173 states that no offence was disclosed. The Court clarified that the Magistrate is not bound by the police's conclusions and may issue process based on the facts presented in the police report. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Magistrate's authority to proceed with the case despite the police's disagreement.

H. S. BAINS DIRECTOR SMALL SAVING-CUM-DEPUTY SECRETARY,FINA vs THE STATE (UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH) · Niyam