Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1980

Supreme Court of India · 1980-05-02

VISHNU AWATAR ETC. vs SHIV AUTAR AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1979/62753
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VISHNU AWATAR ETC.
Respondent
SHIV AUTAR AND ORS.
Author
V.R. KRISHNAIYER
Bench
V.R. KRISHNAIYER

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions, affirming that under Section 3 of the U.P. Amendment Act, 1978, the High Court does not have revisory jurisdiction over decisions from District Courts in cases valued below Rs. 20,000. The Court emphasized that the interpretation of state legislation should rarely be disturbed unless there is an egregious error, and clarified that only cases with a valuation of Rs. 20,000 or more allow for High Court review. The judgment underscores the importance of accessibility to justice and the need for procedural reforms in the context of socio-economic diversity in Uttar Pradesh.

VISHNU AWATAR ETC. vs SHIV AUTAR AND ORS. · Niyam