Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1980

Supreme Court of India · 1980-04-16

MAIMOONA KHATUN AND ANR. vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1970/60093
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAIMOONA KHATUN AND ANR.
Respondent
STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
Author
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI
Bench
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that in cases of reinstatement after dismissal, the limitation period for claiming arrears of salary begins from the date of reinstatement, not the date of dismissal. The Court ruled that the appellants, being the widow and daughter of Zamirul Hassan, were entitled to recover arrears of salary amounting to Rs. 3035-5-0, as the employee was illegally prevented from duty. The High Court's acceptance of the limitation plea was overturned, affirming the trial court's findings regarding the illegal termination and reinstatement.

MAIMOONA KHATUN AND ANR. vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANR. · Niyam