Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1980

Supreme Court of India · 1980-04-21

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. vs JAGE RAM AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1969/60162
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
Respondent
JAGE RAM AND ORS.
Author
Y.V. (() CHANDRACHUD
Bench
Y.V. ((CJ) CHANDRACHUD

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a writ petition cannot enforce reciprocal rights and obligations arising out of a contract, specifically in the context of the Punjab Excise Act, 1974. The Court held that the cancellation of the respondents' liquor licence was valid due to their failure to pay the required instalments as per the auction conditions and the Punjab Liquor Licence Rules, 1956. The Court affirmed the authority's decision to reauction the vend after the cancellation of the licence.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. vs JAGE RAM AND ORS. · Niyam