Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1979

Supreme Court of India · 1979-04-17

MADHAV PRASAD JATIA vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, U.P., LUCKNOW

Citation / case number
SC 1972/60240
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MADHAV PRASAD JATIA
Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, U.P., LUCKNOW
Bench
TULZAPURKAR, V.D.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 10(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, an assessee can claim a deduction for interest on borrowed capital if the money was borrowed for business purposes and interest was paid. Additionally, for deductions under Section 10(2)(xv), the expenditure must not be capital or personal and must be wholly for business purposes. The Court dismissed the appeals, affirming that the conditions for claiming deductions were not met in this case, thus upholding the decisions of the taxing authorities and the Appellate Tribunal.

MADHAV PRASAD JATIA vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, U.P., LUCKNOW · Niyam