B. N. MUTTO & ANR. vs T. K. NANDI

The Supreme Court interpreted Sections 14(1)(e), 14A, and 25B(5) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, establishing that a landlord can seek eviction if the premises are required bona fide for personal occupation and no other suitable accommodation is available. The Court held that the landlord's retirement from government service did not preclude him from invoking the provisions of Section 25B(5) for eviction. The Court upheld the Rent Controller's decision to reject the tenant's objections regarding the maintainability of the eviction petition.