Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1978

Supreme Court of India · 1978-03-13

M. R. DHAWAN vs DELHI ADMINISTRATION & RAJA PRATAP BHANU PRAKASH SINGH

Citation / case number
SC 1977/61822
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M. R. DHAWAN
Respondent
DELHI ADMINISTRATION & RAJA PRATAP BHANU PRAKASH SINGH
Author
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI
Bench
SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 437 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, a revisional court may either set aside a magistrate's order of discharge and direct a fresh inquiry or commit the accused for trial without further inquiry. The Court clarified that it is not within its purview to assess the sufficiency of evidence for discharge in a special leave appeal. Furthermore, the Court noted that the commitment inquiry is governed by the 1973 Code if pending at its commencement, thus affirming the High Court's order for commitment under Section 409 IPC.

M. R. DHAWAN vs DELHI ADMINISTRATION & RAJA PRATAP BHANU PRAKASH SINGH · Niyam