Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1978

Supreme Court of India · 1978-03-28

B. J. SHELAT vs STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1977/61819
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B. J. SHELAT
Respondent
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
Author
P.S. KAILASAM
Bench
P.S. KAILASAM

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Rule 161(2)(ii) of the Bombay Civil Services Rules, holding that the Appointing Authority must communicate its decision to withhold permission for voluntary retirement if departmental proceedings are pending. The Court clarified that while the right to retire is generally absolute, it can be restricted under certain conditions, such as suspension or pending proceedings. The Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant, affirming that the Government could take disciplinary action post-retirement if proper procedures were followed.

B. J. SHELAT vs STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. · Niyam