Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1978

Supreme Court of India · 1978-03-01

MANAGEMENT OF BORPUKHURIE TEA ESTATE vs PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ASSAM AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1971/60367
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MANAGEMENT OF BORPUKHURIE TEA ESTATE
Respondent
PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ASSAM AND ANR.
Author
JASWANT SINGH
Bench
JASWANT SINGH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 33(3)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, an employer must seek approval from the appropriate authority before dismissing a protected workman during the pendency of an industrial dispute. The Court held that the management's dismissal of the respondent, a protected workman, was invalid as it did not obtain the necessary permission, thus reinforcing the protective measures for workers under the Act. The Court emphasized that any amendment to the application regarding the applicable section should be permitted by the Tribunals.

MANAGEMENT OF BORPUKHURIE TEA ESTATE vs PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ASSAM AND ANR. · Niyam