SHAMBHU NATH PALIT vs CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA AND ANR.

The Supreme Court upheld the provisions of Section 202 of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951, which allows landowners to collect rates attributable to huts owned by tenants. The Court clarified that the Thika Tenancy Act does not impede the collection of such rates, as it pertains to rent, while Section 202 specifically addresses rates. The Court also dismissed the challenge under Article 14 of the Constitution, stating that the classification of bastis and their dwellers does not constitute discrimination against landowners, as their rights are protected under the Act.