Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1978

Supreme Court of India · 1978-02-28

HIMMATBHAI SON OF CHAGANLAL vs RIKHILAL AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1968/60435
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HIMMATBHAI SON OF CHAGANLAL
Respondent
RIKHILAL AND ORS.
Author
P.S. KAILASAM
Bench
P.S. KAILASAM

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that an application under Order 21, Rule 90 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) by one judgment debtor does not bar other judgment debtors from filing an application under Order 21, Rule 89 CPC. The Court overturned the High Court's decision which had dismissed the application under Rule 89 on the grounds of the pending Rule 90 application. The Court clarified that the two rules operate independently, allowing the application under Rule 89 to proceed despite the existence of a Rule 90 application.

HIMMATBHAI SON OF CHAGANLAL vs RIKHILAL AND ORS. · Niyam