Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1977

Supreme Court of India · 1977-10-14

STATE OF PUNJAB vs M/s. GEETA IRON & BRASS WORKS LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 1977/61847
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF PUNJAB
Respondent
M/s. GEETA IRON & BRASS WORKS LTD.
Author
V.R. KRISHNAIYER
Bench
V.R. KRISHNAIYER

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, a party can seek to stay legal proceedings if there is an agreement to refer disputes to arbitration. The Court emphasized that silence in response to a statutory notice under Section 80 CPC does not bar a party from invoking arbitration. The Court dismissed the special leave petition, affirming that the lower court's refusal to stay proceedings was justified due to the appellant's inaction in pursuing arbitration, thus promoting the resolution of disputes through arbitration rather than litigation.

STATE OF PUNJAB vs M/s. GEETA IRON & BRASS WORKS LTD. · Niyam