Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1977

Supreme Court of India · 1977-01-05

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1968/60214
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
Bench
RAY, A.N. (CJ)

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a litigant is barred only when they omit to sue with knowledge of their right to claim. If a right is unknown or non-existent at the time of the first suit, it does not constitute a portion of the claim. The Court further clarified that a plaintiff is not entitled to salary during suspension under Fundamental Rule 53, as the cause of action for salary accrues only upon reinstatement. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision.

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. · Niyam