Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1976

Supreme Court of India · 1976-11-26

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GUJARAT-II, AHMEDABAD, vs R.M. AMIN

Citation / case number
SC 1972/60278
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GUJARAT-II, AHMEDABAD,
Respondent
R.M. AMIN
Author
HANS RAJ KHANNA
Bench
HANS RAJ KHANNA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Uganda company is not a company within the meaning of Section 2(17) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and therefore, the distribution of assets during voluntary liquidation does not constitute a transfer liable to capital gains tax under Section 45. The Court emphasized that the distribution merely recognized existing legal rights rather than creating new ones, following the precedent set in Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras v. Madurai Mills Co. Ltd., 89 ITR 45. Consequently, the provisions of Section 46(2) do not apply, and the assessee is not liable for capital gains tax on the amount received from the liquidation.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GUJARAT-II, AHMEDABAD, vs R.M. AMIN · Niyam