Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 1976

Supreme Court of India · 1976-07-19

MURLIDHAR MEGHRAJ LOYA ETC. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 1976/60817
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MURLIDHAR MEGHRAJ LOYA ETC.
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC.
Author
V.R. KRISHNAIYER
Bench
V.R. KRISHNAIYER

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellants under Section 2(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, for selling khurasani oil adulterated with 30% groundnut oil, violating Rule 44(a). The Court clarified that the offence fell under Section 16(1)(a) and not under the proviso, affirming the High Court's decision to enhance the sentence to six months imprisonment and a fine of one thousand rupees. The Court emphasized that the definition of adulteration under Section 2(i)(a) was applicable, and the judicial discretion to reduce the sentence was not warranted in this case.

MURLIDHAR MEGHRAJ LOYA ETC. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC. · Niyam