ALEMBIC GLASS INDUSTRIES LTD. BARODA & OTHERS vs THE WORKMEN & OTHERS

The Supreme Court held that Section 61 of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 does not bar the grant of sick leave, as the Act does not address sick leave benefits. The Court found that the sickness benefits under the Act are inadequate, amounting to only half the average wage and not covering the first two days of sickness. The Tribunal's decision to restore sick leave benefits was upheld, emphasizing that the Act does not encompass all aspects of sickness benefits, particularly the provision for full emoluments during illness.